Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
urol. colomb. (Bogotá. En línea) ; 32(3): 93-99, 2023. graf, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | COLNAL, LILACS | ID: biblio-1518293

RESUMO

La literatura disponible sobre las implicaciones de la urolitiasis en la donación y trasplante renal (TxR) con injertos de donante cadavérico es limitada; la información disponible tiene especial énfasis en el donante vivo. Objetivo: Exponer la producción bibliográfica y las implicaciones clínicas de la urolitiasis en el proceso de donación y TxR incluyendo la perspectiva con injertos de donante cadavérico. Métodos: Análisis bibliométrico ejecutado mediante una búsqueda sistemática de la literatura en Medline, Embase, SciELO, Cochrane Central, Google Académico y Web of Science utilizando combinaciones de los términos MesH "urolithiasis", "kidney calculi", "ureteral calculi", "tissue and organ procurement", "brain death", "living donors" y "kidney transplantation". Se limitó la búsqueda a artículos publicados entre los años 2000-2022. Resultados: Se analizaron 23 artículos. El 95.6% de ellos fueron publicados en inglés, el 26% se publicaron en revistas del cuartil 1, solo un tercio de ellos tienen relación con el donante cadavérico. La urolitiasis en el injerto renal no es una contraindicación absoluta para el trasplante, se puede ofrecer manejo quirúrgico activo ex vivo durante la cirugía de banco para cálculos > 4 mm y el trasplante con observación para injertos renales con cálculos < 4 mm. Conclusiones: La producción científica en términos de litiasis urinaria y donación/TxR es limitada. El hallazgo incidental de urolitiasis en el donante vivo o cadavérico de riñón no es una contraindic


The clinical literature about the implications of urolithiasis in the process of kidney donation/transplantation (KTx) from deceased donors is scarce. Objectives: To expose the current state of bibliographic production and the clinical implications of urolithiasis in the process of kidney donation/transplantation focus on cadaveric donor grafts. Methods: We performed a bibliometric analysis based on a systematic review of the literature in Medline, Embase, SciELO, Cochrane Central, Google Scholar and Web of Science using combinations (OR, AND) of MesH terms: "urolithiasis", "kidney calculi", "ureteral calculi", "tissue and organ procurement", "brain death", "living donors" and "kidney transplantation". The search was limited to primary articles, systematic reviews or meta-analyses performed in humans published between 2000-2022. Results: Twenty-three articles were included for analysis; 95.6% of the bibliographic production was published in English, 26% were published into quartile 1 journals. One third of the references were focused on cadaveric donors. The information obtained concludes that presence of urolithiasis in the kidney graft is not an absolute contraindication for KTx and proposes the ex vivo surgical management of urolithiasis during the bench surgery for stones > 4 mm and to proceed with KTx and then follow-up for kidney grafts with stones < 4 mm. Conclusions: The scientific production related to urolithiasis and kidney donation/transplantation is limited. The literature available concludes that incidental kidney stones in kidney grafts should not be considered an absolute contraindication for KTx. Ex vivo surgical management of urolithiasis is a feasible and safe prior to KTx


Assuntos
Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...